India's next mine is already above ground, and the e-waste plants built for it have room to spare
The Mines Minister says recycling can deliver critical minerals years before a new mine opens. India's authorised e-waste recyclers can process close to three times what they actually handled in 2023-24. And most of the material still sits with the people who collect it. That gap is a business, and the people standing in it are not the ones the headlines usually talk about.
A new mine in India takes seven to ten years to start producing, Mines Minister G. Kishan Reddy told an industry conference in New Delhi in September 2026. A godown full of dead laptops, circuit boards and tangled cable can start producing the day someone puts it on a weighing scale. That contrast is behind the government's sudden warmth toward e-waste, and it points a light at a group that rarely gets one: the collectors, dismantlers and aggregators who already hold the material.
The minister's own estimate is that 90 to 95% of India's e-waste still moves through informal hands. Authorised recyclers, meanwhile, have built more room than they are using, and a ₹1,500 crore central scheme is backing more of it. Plenty of capacity, plenty of attention, and the material sitting somewhere else. If you collect or trade e-waste, that is a good place to stand, with a few honest caveats further down.
The numbers at a glance
| Metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| E-waste generated, 2023-24 (government figures to Parliament) | About 17.5 to 17.8 lakh tonnes |
| Share processed, 2023-24 | 43%, roughly 7.6 lakh tonnes |
| Authorised recycling capacity, February 2025 | 22.09 lakh tonnes a year, across 322 recyclers |
| Share handled informally (Mines Minister, September 2026) | 90 to 95% |
| Consumer e-waste reaching authorised recyclers (Redseer, February 2025) | 16% |
| Value recoverable with current technology vs actually recovered (Redseer) | About $3.6 billion vs about $1.1 billion |
| Copper recovery, India vs global (Redseer) | 40 to 45% vs about 75% |
| Critical mineral recycling scheme, September 2026 | ₹1,500 crore; 125 entities registered; 58 projects approved |
| New plants announced (examples) | Attero: three of 25,000 tonnes a year each; Mitarsh: 25,000 tonnes a year |
Why the government suddenly cares about your godown
The Cabinet cleared the recycling scheme on 3 September 2025: ₹1,500 crore over six years, built around at least 2.7 lakh tonnes of recycling capacity and 40,000 tonnes of critical mineral output a year. By the minister's account in September 2026, 125 entities had registered and 58 projects were approved, expected to recover about 96,000 tonnes of critical minerals a year. That is well above what the scheme was designed around, so the two figures may be counting different things. Treat the 96,000 as the minister's number, not a settled one.
Two details matter if you are not a plant owner. First, the scheme's own language talks about bringing dismantlers, crushers and shredders into the formal chain. The middle of the chain, the people between a household and a refinery, is named. Second, the money goes to recyclers: up to ₹50 crore for a large entity and ₹25 crore for a small one, and it backs actual metal extraction, not just the making of black mass. So do not expect a cheque as a collector. Expect a buyer who has funding and a reason to want more material.
The ministry also ran a collection drive from 2 to 31 October 2026, coordinated by JNARDDC with the Materials Recycling Association of India, and Reddy opened a collection stall in New Delhi to launch it. A drive like that is less about the tonnes it collects than about the signal it sends: this material has a buyer and a national purpose now.
The plants have room, at least on paper
Parliament was told in March 2025 that India had 322 authorised e-waste recyclers with a combined capacity of 22,08,918 tonnes a year, citing CPCB. The same answer put e-waste generation in 2023-24 at about 17.8 lakh tonnes, and an earlier reply to Parliament put the share processed that year at 43%, up from 22% in 2019-20. That works out to roughly 7.6 lakh tonnes.
Put those side by side and authorised capacity is larger than everything the country generated, and close to three times what was processed. Two cautions apply. Authorised is not the same as built and running. And the capacity figure is from February 2025 while the processing figure is from 2023-24, so this is a comparison of scale, not a utilisation rate.
More is on the way. Attero announced ₹150 crore in December 2025 for three new e-waste plants in Pune, Bengaluru and Faridabad at 25,000 tonnes a year each, taking its total to 244,000 tonnes. Mitarsh broke ground on a 25,000 tonne plant in Gujarat the same month. Eco Recycling and the American firm ERI announced ERI India on 31 August 2026, with Eco Recycling as the sourcing partner and a Mumbai launch planned later in 2026. Nobody builds capacity hoping the material will not show up. They are betting it will, and they need someone to bring it.
One honest note on the numbers: they disagree. Parliament says 43% was processed. Redseer says only 16% of consumer e-waste reaches authorised recyclers. The minister says 90 to 95% is informal. Even the total differs, from about 17.5 lakh tonnes in government figures to 3.8 million tonnes in Redseer's count for 2024. These measure different things, so treat them as a range. What matters is that they all point the same way: most e-waste is still outside the formal system, and they only argue about how far outside.
Why it has not moved already, and it is not because anyone is doing it wrong
The informal chain wins on cost. Redseer's analysis finds that authorised recyclers carry high operating expenses and often earn single-digit margins, or lose money, while informal operators keep costs minimal and earn high margins. Rest of World reported in August 2025 that about 95% of the sector's workers are informal, and that moving into the formal system can mean paying 18% tax on material that currently trades without it. RecycleKaro's CEO Prassann Daphal told the same report that fixing collection at the source "will take a lot of time."
Add the households. Redseer estimates that 10 to 15% of consumer e-waste stays at home and another 8 to 10% ends up in landfill, so a share of the supply never reaches anyone's godown at all.
So the chain is not broken. It works for the people in it. That is why this is an opportunity and not an instruction: nobody has to switch, and nobody should switch without running the numbers. The point is that you now have a choice of buyers, which you did not have a few years ago.
Where the value leaks, and who can catch it
Redseer puts the secondary-metal potential in India's e-waste at about $6 billion. It estimates current technology could unlock about $3.6 billion of that, against about $1.1 billion recovered now. The gap shows up most clearly in copper: India recovers 40 to 45% against roughly 75% globally.
Most of that loss happens at the processing stage, where crude extraction leaves metal behind that a proper plant would capture. A plant that gets more out of the same tonne has more to share. Whether it shares with the person who supplied the tonne is a negotiation, and our reading is that a negotiation goes better when the buyer has empty capacity than when the buyer is scrambling for stock.
What this means for you
Start by knowing what you hold. Sort and weigh by type, because a recycler will price boards, cable and mixed scrap differently, and a collector who can say "four tonnes a month, sorted" is a different conversation from one who cannot.
Then talk to more than one buyer. Ask an authorised recycler three plain questions: do you buy directly, what paperwork do you need from me, and will you commit to a monthly volume? Compare that against what your present buyer pays. The answer may be that your present buyer is still the best one. That is fine, and now you know.
Look at the bulk lane too. Offices and IT companies need documented pickups and secure disposal, which is exactly the service ERI is bringing to India. An aggregator who can offer clean paperwork and reliable collection can sit between those clients and a plant.
Finally, count the cost of formalising before you do it. The 18% tax point from Rest of World is real money, and your accountant should price it against what a better buyer pays. Opportunity is not the same as automatic.
What to watch
- What the October drive delivers. It closes on 31 October 2026. Whether the ministry publishes collection totals, and who it credits, will show how serious the push is.
- Which announced plants actually open. Attero's three, Mitarsh's Gujarat plant and the Mumbai launch of ERI India are all promised, but commissioning dates are not confirmed.
- The next scheme approvals. Whether the 58 approved projects become 100, and how many sit close to collection hubs.
- Whether buying prices move. If capacity really is chasing material, you would expect authorised recyclers to compete harder for stock. Watch your own quotes.
- The next official numbers. Parliament's figures for 2024-25 will show whether the processed share keeps climbing from 43%.
The bottom line
The government wants the minerals, authorised plants have room, and most of the material is still in the hands of people who gather it. That is the setup for a better deal than the one many collectors have had, but only for those who know their volumes, ask for a second quote and read the paperwork. The mine is real. So is the work of getting it out.

Discussion
Be the first to comment.